 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Machine Tool Archive Lathes for Sale E-MAIL Tony@lathes.co.uk
Stark - Early Lathes Countershafts Stark Home Page No. 4 Lathe No. 3 Lathe Screwcutting Countershafts Tailstocks Production Lathes Watchmaker's Machinery No. 4 Lathe Photographs The above Hyperlinks all connect to early Stark machines. To reach the other Stark material, go to the Stark Home Page
Stark Countershafts, like those of many other makers, were available in a variety of forms from simple 3-speed units to more complex affairs where a multitude of speeds, in both forward and reverse - as well as stopping and starting - could be obtained instantly by flicking belts from one pulley to another. All of Stark's early systems used flat belts - thankfully they avoided the wretchedly inefficient round leather rope or "gut" drive of many cheaper machines - and all included a control system which involved "fast-and-loose pulleys" where a belt, idling on a "loose" or "free" pulley which was free to rotate on its shaft, could be flicked across to a "fast" or "connected" pulley and transmit the power onwards, usually to a 3-step pulley, which drove a matching pulley on the lathe spindle. Although the illustrations below show the countershaft which drove the lathe, it is worth remembering that this would represent only a small part of the drive system, especially on ones offering multiple speeds and reverse. If, for example, three fast-and-loose pulleys were employed to give high, low and reverse ranges - as on Countershaft No. 2 - then a matching arrangement, driven by overhead line shafting (or in later years an individual electric motor) had to be provided either above, below or behind it. No wonder that many of the largest advertisements in industrial towns of the Victorian era were for power transmissions systems of one sort or another - they could easily represent a substantial proportion of the cost of the machinery they drove. When a basic Stark bench lathe cost $100, the No. 1 countershaft was priced at $12, the No. 2 at $18 and the No. 3 at $25 - and that was without the ancillary drive gear and line shafting required to bring power to them when the total cost would have risen beyond that of the lathe itself.. Later Stark lathes adopted underdrive stands and integrated drive systems with one lathe boasting not only a built-on motor but a completely enclosed variable-speed drive system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
"Counter No. 3" was the most complex and expensive of the early Stark countershaft units. The three fast-and-loose pulleys grouped together between the support arms were arranged to give a high speed, a low speed and a reverse setting. The unit would, of course, have required suitable ancillary drives - from overhead line shafting for example - to accomplish this. A separate drive was also required to drive the long overhead drum - the purpose of which was to power, via a thin cord belt, a toolpost-mounted high-speed grinding or milling head; the length of the drum matched the between-centres' capacity of the lathe and allowed the driving cord to follow the lathe carriage as it slid up and down the bed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Counter No. 2" for wall or ceiling mounting - identical in function to the No. 3 unit, but without the ancillary overhead drive drum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|